NVIDIA GeForce MX350 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1354 MHz versus 672 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 46.98 GTexel/s versus 10.8 billion / sec
- 6.7x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 96
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 75% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 95% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) versus 900 MHz
- 5.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2807 versus 478
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 versus 91
- 6.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13562 versus 2171
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 versus 960
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 2210
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 2701
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 versus 960
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 2210
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 2701
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 5 January 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz versus 672 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel/s versus 10.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 versus 96 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) versus 900 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 versus 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 versus 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 versus 2171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 versus 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 versus 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 2701 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 | 2171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2701 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.85 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.727 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Nom de code | GP107 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 5 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 654 | 1503 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1468 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz | 672 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel/s | 10.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3300 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Performance á point flottant | 258.05 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 56.06 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 900 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |