NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 4.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1247 vs 305
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 30 April 2019 |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 vs 305 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1354 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 2807
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 235
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 13562
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 4655
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 4655
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1354 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 vs 2807 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 235 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 13562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | 7881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | 564 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 | 39165 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | 305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Code name | GP107 | TU107 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 30 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 654 | 376 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX350 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
