NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2807 vs 2392
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13562 vs 9329
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 vs 4027
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 vs 4027
- Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1247 vs 888
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 21 February 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 937 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 vs 2392 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 vs 9329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 vs 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 vs 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3710 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 vs 888 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 235
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 20 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 vs 235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | 2392 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 | 9329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | 888 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP107 | GP108B |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 21 February 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 654 | 861 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | 1,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX350 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
