NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 284.4x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 10 March 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 3584 vs 896
- 5.5x more maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 10002 MHz
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 vs 3750
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 307
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67670 vs 28933
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2406.499 vs 849.116
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 6326
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 6326
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2231 vs 2114
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1575 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 896 |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 10002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 vs 3750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 vs 28933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 vs 849.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 vs 2114 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 18598 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 2406.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 2231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GP102 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 10 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 524 | 219 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 3584 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |