NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.8x more core clock speed: 832 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1155 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 52.80 GTexel/s
• 5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 10 nm
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 396 vs 383
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5784 vs 2666
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38658 vs 11991

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	396 383
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5784 2666
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	38658 11991

Compare specifications (specs)