NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1155 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 420x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
Launch date | May 2022 vs 2 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 832 MHz
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2048
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 vs 398
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13802 vs 5729
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 vs 38362
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 832 MHz |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 852 vs 398 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13802 vs 5729 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 vs 38362 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 398 | 852 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5729 | 13802 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38362 | 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5747 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GA107 | GM200 |
Launch date | May 2022 | 2 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 313 | 306 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Price now | $679.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 176 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | unknown | 8,000 million |
CUDA cores | 2816 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |