NVIDIA GeForce MX570A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 351x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 187.5x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s
Launch date | May 2022 vs 15 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 832 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1155 MHz
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 387
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 6174
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47421 vs 39667
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 832 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1155 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 387 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 6174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47421 vs 39667 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 387 | 603 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6174 | 10465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39667 | 47421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5529 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA107 | GP104B |
Launch date | May 2022 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 309 | 311 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 150 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |