NVIDIA GeForce MX570A vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570A and NVIDIA Quadro CX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 832 MHz vs 602 MHz
- 1920x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 38.5 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 55 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6006 vs 947
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | May 2022 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz vs 602 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 38.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6006 vs 947 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro CX
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 454 vs 381
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 454 vs 381 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro CX
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | NVIDIA Quadro CX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 381 | 454 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6006 | 947 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39441 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | NVIDIA Quadro CX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GA107 | GT200B |
Launch date | May 2022 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 315 | 317 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 602 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 38.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 150 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |