NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 832 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1155 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 10 nm
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 2 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 10 nm |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 142 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Tiger Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 2 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1698 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 147.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 422.4 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.462 TFLOPS (2:1) | 3.379 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | 1.690 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 36.96 GPixel/s | 26.40 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 105.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compute units | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |