NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD FireStream 9270
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and AMD FireStream 9270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2656x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 30 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 2048 vs 800
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 55 nm
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7707 vs 1341
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 13 November 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s vs 30 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 800 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7707 vs 1341 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9270
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9270
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | AMD FireStream 9270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 473 | 473 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7707 | 1341 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43327 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3924 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | AMD FireStream 9270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale |
Code name | GA107 | RV770 |
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 13 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 293 | 294 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 750 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.100 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 800 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s | 30 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 160 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |