NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 355.7x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 9.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 10 July 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 473
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9571 vs 7707
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53279 vs 43327
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4739 vs 3924
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2048 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 vs 473 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9571 vs 7707 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53279 vs 43327 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 vs 3924 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 473 | 795 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7707 | 9571 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43327 | 53279 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3924 | 4739 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Fiji |
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 10 July 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 293 | 291 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Price now | $399.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.100 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compute units | 56 | |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |