NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 431.2x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 9.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1050 MHz
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1050 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2048
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 vs 473
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9412 vs 7707
- Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4242 vs 3924
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 vs 473 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9412 vs 7707 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 vs 3924 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 473 | 824 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7707 | 9412 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43327 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3924 | 4242 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.288 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 683.568 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11675 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11675 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Grenada |
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 293 | 292 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $429 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.100 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compute units | 44 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,914 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | 275 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 512 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |