NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 960 MHz vs 930 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 9.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 750 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11353 vs 7748
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 vs 9143
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 vs 9143
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 26 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 960 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 750 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11353 vs 7748 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 vs 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 vs 9143 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100
- Around 47% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 1920
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 vs 540
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3720
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3720
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3358
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 1920 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | AMD FirePro W9100 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5888 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | 796 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11353 | 7748 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 32085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 32085 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 106.585 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1878.403 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.751 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.208 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU106B | Hawaii |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 26 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 201 | 200 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 960 MHz | 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 2816 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 750 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,238 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 163.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 275 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s |