NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 960 MHz vs 930 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 9.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 750 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11355 vs 7987
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 vs 9143
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 vs 9143
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 26 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 960 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 750 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11355 vs 7987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 vs 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 vs 9143 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100
- Around 47% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 1920
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 540
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3720
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3720
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3358
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 1920 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 vs 540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 vs 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 vs 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | AMD FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5906 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | 752 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11355 | 7987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 32085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 32085 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 106.585 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1878.403 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.751 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.208 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | TU106B | Hawaii |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 26 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 204 | 190 |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 960 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 2816 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 6,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,238 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 163.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Length | 275 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
AppleA14 Bionic
