NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super und AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Etwa 29% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 175 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87069 vs 77153
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.053 vs 24.769
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 vs 14699
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 vs 3720
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 vs 3369
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 vs 14699
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 vs 3720
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 vs 3369
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87069 vs 77153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 vs 24.769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 vs 3369 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Etwa 9% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1605 MHz vs 1470 MHz
- Etwa 15% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16664 vs 16576
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 859
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 vs 246.191
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 vs 3885.018
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 165.463
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 vs 1271.757
- 4743x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9486 vs 2
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz vs 1470 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16664 vs 16576 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 859 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 vs 246.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 3885.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 165.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 vs 1271.757 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 vs 2 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16576 | 16664 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 | 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87069 | 77153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 9486 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | RDNA |
Codename | TU106 | Navi 10 |
Startdatum | 2 July 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $400 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 145 | 148 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1650 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1470 MHz | 1605 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 2176 | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 89 C | |
Leitungssysteme | 2176 | |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 175 Watt | 225 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.8 B | 10.3 B |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texturfüllrate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Anzahl der gleichzeitigen Anzeigen | 4 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Länge | 9.0” (228.60mm) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 8 pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Breite | 2-Slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologien |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |