NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 890 vs 785
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21449 vs 19800
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21449 vs 19800
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 890 vs 785 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21449 vs 19800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21449 vs 19800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1470 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98317 vs 84411
- 5363.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10727 vs 2
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1470 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16498 vs 16466 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98317 vs 84411 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10727 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16466 | 16498 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 890 | 785 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 84411 | 98317 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 243.864 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3899.353 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.084 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 170.006 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1274.07 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21449 | 19800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21449 | 19800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 10727 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU106 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $2,299 |
| Place in performance rating | 42 | 43 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2176 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
| Pipelines | 2176 | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10.8 B | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
| Length | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop
