NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 200 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16580 versus 16036
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 860 versus 752
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 246.191 versus 226.447
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.053 versus 25.476
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 165.463 versus 118.544
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1271.757 versus 1106.12
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 versus 19811
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 versus 3719
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 versus 3358
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 versus 19811
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 versus 3719
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16580 versus 16036 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 860 versus 752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 versus 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 versus 25.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 versus 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 versus 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 versus 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 versus 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1470 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1650 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 87122
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 versus 3885.018
- 5342.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 1470 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1650 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 87122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 versus 3885.018 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16580 | 16036 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 860 | 752 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87122 | 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 4161.764 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 25.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 10685 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU106 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $2,299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 145 | 153 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.8 B | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Longeur | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |