NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1304 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1442 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 235 Watt
- 9.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 vs 1056.078
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 16640
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 16640
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2019 vs 1 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1304 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1442 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 vs 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 16640 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Around 87% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 1920
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16374 vs 14149
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 750
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 84757 vs 70668
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 355.937 vs 220.337
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4858.771 vs 3131.344
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.191 vs 21.852
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 144.928 vs 135.923
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 7442
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 6714
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 7442
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 6714
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1920 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16374 vs 14149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 84757 vs 70668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 vs 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 vs 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.191 vs 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 144.928 vs 135.923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 vs 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 vs 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 vs 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 vs 6714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14149 | 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70668 | 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7489 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU106 | GP100 |
Launch date | 7 January 2019 | 1 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Place in performance rating | 150 | 87 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 3584 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,329 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 322.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Memory bandwidth | 921.6 GB / s |