NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 215 Watt
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3718
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3359
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3718
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3359
  • 1050.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7353 vs 7
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 2 July 2019
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W vs 215 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 10384 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10130 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 10384 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10130 vs 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7353 vs 7

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

  • Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • 10.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18252 vs 13930
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 632
  • Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99847 vs 68337
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 20002
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 20002
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1605 MHz vs 930 MHz
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 18252 vs 13930
PassMark - G2D Mark 885 vs 632
Geekbench - OpenCL 99847 vs 68337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25232 vs 20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25232 vs 20002

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13930
18252
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
632
885
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
68337
99847
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20002
25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10384
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10130
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20002
25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10384
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10130
3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
7353
7
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark 13930 18252
PassMark - G2D Mark 632 885
Geekbench - OpenCL 68337 99847
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20002 25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 10384 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10130 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20002 25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 10384 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10130 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7353 7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1438.826

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU104B TU104
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 2 July 2019
Place in performance rating 116 133
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $499

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1080 MHz 1770 MHz
Core clock speed 930 MHz 1605 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 2560
Pixel fill rate 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 172.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W 215 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 13.6 B
CUDA cores 2560
Maximum GPU temperature 88 C
Render output units 64

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
Display Port 1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 6 pin + 8 pin
Width IGP 2-Slot
Height 4.556” (115.7mm)
Length 10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 650 Watt

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 352.0 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready