NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 230 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13650 vs 13225
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76826 vs 69537
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20002 vs 13044
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 7164
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20002 vs 13044
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 7164
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 13 August 2018 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13650 vs 13225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76826 vs 69537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20002 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 vs 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20002 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 vs 7164 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 783 vs 614
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 10130
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 10130
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 783 vs 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 10130 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 10130 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13650 | 13225 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 614 | 783 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76826 | 69537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20002 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20002 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 | 30936 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7342 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU104B | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 120 | 122 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |