NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 230 Watt
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13637 vs 13047
Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 80223 vs 69530
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20002 vs 13044
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 7164
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20002 vs 13044
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 7164

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Apr 2020 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 W vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	13637 vs 13047
Geekbench - OpenCL	80223 vs 69530
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20002 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	10384 vs 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20002 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	10384 vs 7164

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 930 MHz
Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 612
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 10130
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 10130

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 930 MHz
Boost clock speed	1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	769 vs 612
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	30936 vs 10130
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	30936 vs 10130

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13637

13047

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

612

769

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

80223

69530

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20002

13044

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10384

7164

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10130

30936

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20002

13044

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10384

7164

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10130

30936

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark	13637	13047
PassMark - G2D Mark	612	769
Geekbench - OpenCL	80223	69530
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20002	13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	10384	7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	10130	30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20002	13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	10384	7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	10130	30936
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Code name	TU104B	Vega 10
Launch date	2 Apr 2020	13 August 2018
Place in performance rating	107	120
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$999
Value for money (0-100)		13.37
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1080 MHz	1530 MHz
Core clock speed	930 MHz	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	172.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.06 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560
Pixel fill rate	69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	172.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 W	230 Watt
Transistor count	13600 million	12,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)	2000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6