NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 230 Watt
  • Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75280 vs 68161
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19935 vs 13044
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19935 vs 13044
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13338 vs 7164
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13338 vs 7164
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15701 vs 13840
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 75280 vs 68161
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19935 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19935 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 13338 vs 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 13338 vs 7164
PassMark - G3D Mark 15701 vs 13840

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 16641
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 16641
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 930 MHz
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 16641
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 16641
PassMark - G2D Mark 770 vs 769

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
75280
68161
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19935
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19935
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13338
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13338
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16641
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16641
30936
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
769
770
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15701
13840
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Geekbench - OpenCL 75280 68161
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19935 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19935 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 13338 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 13338 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 16641 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 16641 30936
PassMark - G2D Mark 769 770
PassMark - G3D Mark 15701 13840
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU104B Vega 10
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 11 13
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1080 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 930 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560
Pixel fill rate 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 172.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W 230 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6