NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 230 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14330 vs 13994
  • Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75227 vs 68523
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19935 vs 13044
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13338 vs 7164
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19935 vs 13044
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13338 vs 7164
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14330 vs 13994
Geekbench - OpenCL 75227 vs 68523
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19935 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 13338 vs 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19935 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 13338 vs 7164

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 748
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 16641
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 16641
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 930 MHz
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 775 vs 748
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 16641
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 16641

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14330
13994
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
748
775
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
75227
68523
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19935
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13338
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16641
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19935
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13338
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16641
30936
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark 14330 13994
PassMark - G2D Mark 748 775
Geekbench - OpenCL 75227 68523
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19935 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 13338 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 16641 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19935 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 13338 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 16641 30936
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU104B Vega 10
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 14 16
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1080 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 930 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560
Pixel fill rate 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 172.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W 230 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6