NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 102.2x more texture fill rate: 220.8 GTexel/s vs 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 580 Watt
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 3 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s vs 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
- 2x more pipelines: 2x 2560 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Pipelines | 2x 2560 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8317 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Grenada |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 3 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 245 | 247 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 220.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.13 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.066 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2x 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 580 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 4x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 2x 345.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |