NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 863.2x more texture fill rate: 220.8 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- Around 5% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2432
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8356 vs 6809
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 2 November 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2432 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8356 vs 6809 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8356 | 6809 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14686 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 51484 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 2 November 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 234 | 235 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Price now | $379.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 220.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.13 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.066 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2432 |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
