NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 796.2x more texture fill rate: 220.8 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 38% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8317 vs 6008
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 1 October 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8317 vs 6008 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 115 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8317 | 6008 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12585 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52705 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3409 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3409 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 245 | 244 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $1,699.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 220.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.13 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.066 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 9016 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |