NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 6.8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 522 vs 406
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 vs 73.167
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 16337
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3719
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 3360
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 16337
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3719
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 3360

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

• Around 79% higher core clock speed: 1312 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1095 MHz
• Around 74% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 2944
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 vs 12983
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 176274 vs 84332
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 vs 297.996
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 vs 3676.805
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 vs 22.75
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1253.829 vs 1116.69

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12983 16235
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	522 406
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	84332 176274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	297.996 500.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3676.805 7209.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.75 41.826
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.692 73.167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1116.69 1253.829
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19139 16337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8905 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8060 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19139 16337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8905 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8060 3360

Compare specifications (specs)