NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 6.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1752 MHz
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 522 versus 406
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 versus 73.167
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 versus 16337
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 versus 3719
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 versus 3360
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 versus 16337
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 versus 3719
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 versus 3360
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 21 June 2017 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1752 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 versus 406 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 versus 73.167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 versus 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 versus 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 versus 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 versus 3360 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Environ 79% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1312 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 40% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1530 MHz versus 1095 MHz
- Environ 74% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 2944
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 versus 12983
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 176274 versus 84332
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 versus 297.996
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 versus 3676.805
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 versus 22.75
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1253.829 versus 1116.69
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1312 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1530 MHz versus 1095 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 2944 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 versus 12983 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 176274 versus 84332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 versus 297.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 versus 3676.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 versus 22.75 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 versus 1116.69 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12983 | 16235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 | 406 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 84332 | 176274 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 500.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 7209.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 41.826 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 73.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 1253.829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7784 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Nom de code | TU104B | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 21 June 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 139 | 136 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1095 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1312 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2944 | 5120 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 438.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 897.0 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600S
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
