NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 588
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15107 vs 10972
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22622 vs 11029
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22622 vs 11029
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 8 August 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 vs 588 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 vs 10972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 vs 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 vs 11029 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 39% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2944
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 6319
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 6319
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2944 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 vs 6319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 vs 6319 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10098 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 | 588 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 | 10972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 170.923 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 106 | 158 |
| Price now | $699.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 37.18 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2944 | 4096 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
