AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1590 MHz
- Around 30% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2944
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 926 vs 812
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19791 vs 15107
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1590 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2944 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 926 vs 812 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19791 vs 15107 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 450 Watt
- 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22622 vs 20988
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22622 vs 20988
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6319 vs 3717
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6319 vs 3717
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5714 vs 3357
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5714 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 450 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 vs 20988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 vs 20988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 926 | 812 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19791 | 15107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 | 22622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 | 22622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 6319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 6319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 5714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 5714 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10070 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 21 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 29 January 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | |
| Place in performance rating | 111 | 108 |
| Price now | $699.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 37.18 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.25 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2944 |
| Pixel fill rate | 240.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
IntelArc A580
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
IntelArc A770M
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Embedded
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600S
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
