NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 1275x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 71% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10255 vs 6008
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 17105
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 17105
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 vs 6008 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 17105 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5581 vs 3652
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5581 vs 3652
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 58
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5581 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5581 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 | 6008 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 5581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 5581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 3360 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11414 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 715 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 48090 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 183 | 181 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1468 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 234.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 7,516 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 320.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 10008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
IntelArc A730M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAL4
