AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3652
- 57.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 58
- 57.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 58
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 58 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1499 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 239.8 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 16433
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 16433
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1499 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 239.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 16433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 16433 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12568 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 59832 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | 20291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | 20291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 58 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 2 Apr 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 186 | 183 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.675 TFLOPS | 9.585 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 13600 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |