NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 vs 13047
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 928 vs 769
• Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 134929 vs 69530
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 vs 171.616
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 vs 4031.404
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 vs 16.925
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 vs 1195.863
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 13044
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 174.185
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3718
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3358
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3718
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	21601 13047
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	928 769
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	134929 69530
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	394.035 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5461.22 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.104 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	174.185 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1987.605 1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23659 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23659 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 30936

Compare specifications (specs)