NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1237 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 729.4x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 750 Watt
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10487 vs 7987
• Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 54821 vs 43046

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

• Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
• 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 606

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	606 752
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10487 7987
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	54821 43046

Compare specifications (specs)