NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1492 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 52.9x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10492 vs 8137
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 54854 vs 53806
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1492 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10492 vs 8137 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 54854 vs 53806 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2560
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 745 vs 606
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 745 vs 606 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 | 745 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10492 | 8137 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 54854 | 53806 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5377 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 | 26 April 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 186 | 188 |
Design | reference | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Price now | $849 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1492 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1237 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2x 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.74 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 8700 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 3x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 277 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | DirectX® 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |