NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1492 MHz vs 947 MHz
- 678.4x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 176.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 vs 755
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10704 vs 8526
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57286 vs 43410
- Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4851 vs 3932
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 vs 24 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1492 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s vs 176.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 vs 755 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10704 vs 8526 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57286 vs 43410 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4851 vs 3932 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
Pipelines | 2816 vs 2560 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 | 755 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10704 | 8526 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57286 | 43410 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4851 | 3932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 117.322 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2460.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.12 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.942 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 628.757 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | AMD Radeon R9 290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 | 24 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 132 | 284 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1492 MHz | 947 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1237 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.74 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 176.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 8700 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,632 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |