NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 215 Watt
- 693x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4851 vs 7
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 vs 2 July 2019 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4851 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1237 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1492 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 853
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18198 vs 10704
- Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98281 vs 57286
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1237 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1492 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 853 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18198 vs 10704 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98281 vs 57286 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 | 879 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10704 | 18198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57286 | 98281 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4851 | 7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA107 | TU104 |
Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 | 2 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 132 | 129 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1492 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1237 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.74 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 8700 million | 13.6 B |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |