NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 vs 775
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10704 vs 9104
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57286 vs 44527
- 4.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4851 vs 1032
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 vs 12 Dec 2019 |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1408 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 vs 775 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10704 vs 9104 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57286 vs 44527 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4851 vs 1032 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1237 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1492 MHz
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1237 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1492 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 | 775 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10704 | 9104 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57286 | 44527 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4851 | 1032 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Navi 14 |
Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 | 12 Dec 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 132 | 306 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1492 MHz | 1845 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1237 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.74 GPixel/s | 59.04 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 162.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 8700 million | 6400 million |
Compute units | 22 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |