NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 4.1x more core clock speed: 1237 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1492 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 vs 355
• 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10704 vs 1894
• 5.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4851 vs 862

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	853 355
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10704 1894
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4851 862

Compare specifications (specs)