NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro W5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 11065
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3360
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 11065
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 19 Nov 2019 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 vs 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 vs 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 3360 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 712 MHz
- Around 83% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15222 vs 6890
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 413
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69136 vs 50582
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 712 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 vs 6890 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 413 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69136 vs 50582 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6890 | 15222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 922 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50582 | 69136 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4897 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 2021 | 19 Nov 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 191 | 194 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz | 1930 MHz |
Core clock speed | 712 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | 8.893 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | 123.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s | 277.9 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 205 Watt |
Compute units | 36 | |
Transistor count | 10300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | Dual-slot |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |