NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

AMD FirePro W9100

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 1 month(s) later
413.3x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
10x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 750 Watt
Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50582 vs 43046
Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 9143
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 8219
Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 9143
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 8219

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2021 vs 26 March 2014
Texture fill rate	67.65 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 750 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	50582 vs 43046
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15760 vs 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8923 vs 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15760 vs 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8923 vs 8219

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

Around 31% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 712 MHz
Around 38% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2048
4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
3.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7987 vs 6890
Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 413
4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 8045
4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 8045

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	930 MHz vs 712 MHz
Pipelines	2816 vs 2048
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7987 vs 6890
PassMark - G2D Mark	752 vs 413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	32085 vs 8045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	32085 vs 8045

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6890

7987

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

413

752

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

50582

43046

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15760

9143

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8923

8219

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8045

32085

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15760

9143

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8923

8219

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8045

32085

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile	AMD FirePro W9100
PassMark - G3D Mark	6890	7987
PassMark - G2D Mark	413	752
Geekbench - OpenCL	50582	43046
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15760	9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8923	8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8045	32085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15760	9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8923	8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8045	32085
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		511.115

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile	AMD FirePro W9100
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 2.0
Code name	GA107	Hawaii
Launch date	2021	26 March 2014
Place in performance rating	191	189
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1057 MHz
Core clock speed	712 MHz	930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	67.65 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.329 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.329 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2048	2816
Pixel fill rate	42.28 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	67.65 GTexel/s	163.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	750 Watt
Floating-point performance		5,238 gflops
Transistor count		6,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
StereoOutput3D
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Length		275 mm
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	320 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5