NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1057 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 30x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
  • 3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 500 MHz
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 10141
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3713
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 10141
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3713
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 26 April 2016
Boost clock speed 1057 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 67.65 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15760 vs 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8923 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15760 vs 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8923 vs 3713

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo

  • 4x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2048
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8137 vs 6890
  • Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 745 vs 413
  • Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53806 vs 50582
  • 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 8045
  • 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 8045
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2x 4096 vs 2048
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8137 vs 6890
PassMark - G2D Mark 745 vs 413
Geekbench - OpenCL 53806 vs 50582
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 38251 vs 8045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 38251 vs 8045

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6890
8137
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
413
745
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
50582
53806
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15760
10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8923
3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8045
38251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15760
10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8923
3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8045
38251
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark 6890 8137
PassMark - G2D Mark 413 745
Geekbench - OpenCL 50582 53806
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15760 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8923 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8045 38251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15760 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8923 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8045 38251
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4897 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 799.933

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Essentials

Architecture Ampere GCN 3.0
Code name GA107 Capsaicin
Launch date 2021 26 April 2016
Place in performance rating 191 188
Type Laptop Workstation
Design reference
Launch price (MSRP) $1,499
Price now $849
Value for money (0-100) 17.05

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1057 MHz 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 712 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.329 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2048 2x 4096
Pixel fill rate 42.28 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 67.65 GTexel/s 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 350 Watt
Compute units 128
Floating-point performance 2x 8,192 gflops
Transistor count 8,900 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 3x 8-pin
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 277 mm

API support

DirectX 12.2 DirectX® 12
OpenCL 3.0 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.6
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 192 GB/s 512 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 2x 4096 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) 500 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)

Technologies

AppAcceleration
CrossFire
Enduro
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
ZeroCore