NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 1408.2x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 4551
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 4551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 2 September 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 896 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 85 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3717
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3358
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3717
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10129 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57847 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 17482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 17482 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 452 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | Bonaire |
| Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 2 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 279 | 277 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12000 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,882 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 183 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon 550
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Embedded
