NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- 489.8x more texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 876
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2022 vs 2 November 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 876 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 6% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 vs 12873
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55424 vs 49885
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2432 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 vs 12873 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55424 vs 49885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 876 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 14696 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 55424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1471 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA107 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 2022 | 2 November 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 88 | 250 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Price now | $379.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2432 |
| Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro GP100
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6850M XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700S
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600 XT
