NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 564
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12873 vs 7881
• Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49885 vs 39165

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	942 564
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12873 7881
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	49885 39165

Compare specifications (specs)