NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 445.3x more texture fill rate: 171.0 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20611 vs 11029
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20611 vs 11029
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8917 vs 7766
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8917 vs 7766
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 8 August 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 171.0 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20611 vs 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20611 vs 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8917 vs 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8917 vs 7766 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3840 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20611 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20611 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7929 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7929 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8917 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8917 | 7766 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10972 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 588 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 170.923 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 8 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 114 | 158 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 171.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.94 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.94 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 68.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 171.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |