NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20611 vs 17328
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20611 vs 17328
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20611 vs 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20611 vs 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8917 vs 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8917 vs 8912 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 7929
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 7929
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 7929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 7929 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20611 | 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20611 | 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7929 | 8055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7929 | 8055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8917 | 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8917 | 8912 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11748 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU106 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 114 | 178 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1185 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 885 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 171.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.94 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.94 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 68.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 171.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |