NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 590

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz
• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 222.48 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 9374
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 789
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 45591
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 137.469
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 2083.862
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 12.352
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 139.477
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 762.142
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 13383
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 13383
• 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1081

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590

• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 1410 MHz
• Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 200 Watt
• 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	20394 9374
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	989 789
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	109075 45591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	323.141 137.469
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4756.579 2083.862
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.311 12.352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	150.943 139.477
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1474.189 762.142
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 13383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 13383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2671 1081

Compare specifications (specs)