NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 590
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und AMD Radeon RX 590 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 8% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Etwa 14% höhere Texturfüllrate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 222.48 GTexel/s
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 9374
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 789
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 45591
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 137.469
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 2083.862
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 12.352
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 139.477
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 762.142
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 13383
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 13383
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1081
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 15 November 2018 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 222.48 GTexel/s |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 9374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 789 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 45591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 2083.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 139.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1081 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 590
- Etwa 4% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1469 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Etwa 14% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 175 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 4.6x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1469 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 9374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 789 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 45591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 2083.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 139.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1081 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | GA104 | Polaris 30 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 15 November 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $279 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 280 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1469 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 49.54 GP/s |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 222.48 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 175 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 5,700 million |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 241 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |