NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX 590
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 590 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 222.48 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 9374
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 789
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 45591
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 137.469
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 2083.862
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 12.352
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 139.477
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 762.142
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 13383
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 13383
- 2.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1081
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 15 November 2018 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 222.48 GTexel/s |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 9374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 789 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 45591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 2083.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 139.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1081 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1469 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 14% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 4.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 9374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 789 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 45591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 2083.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 139.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1081 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | GA104 | Polaris 30 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 15 November 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $279 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 280 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1469 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 49.54 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 222.48 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 175 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 241 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |