NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 11659
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 776
• Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 58014
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 189.842
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1902.867
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 13.408
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 116.183
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 875.838
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 14998
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 14998
• 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1065

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1410 MHz
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 200 Watt
• 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	20394 11659
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	989 776
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	109075 58014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	323.141 189.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4756.579 1902.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.311 13.408
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	150.943 116.183
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1474.189 875.838
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 14998
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 14998
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2671 1065

Compare specifications (specs)