NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 11659
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 776
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 58014
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 189.842
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1902.867
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 13.408
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 116.183
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 875.838
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 14998
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 14998
- 2.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1065
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 14 March 2019 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 11659 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 776 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 58014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 189.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 1902.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 13.408 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 116.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 875.838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1065 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 4.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8004 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 11659 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 776 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 58014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 189.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1902.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 13.408 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 116.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 875.838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1065 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU116 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 14 March 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $219 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 258 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 6,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 229 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8004 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |