NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 8 Monat(e) später
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 11659
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 776
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 58014
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 189.842
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1902.867
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 13.408
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 116.183
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 875.838
- Etwa 83% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 14998
- Etwa 83% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 14998
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1065
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 14 March 2019 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 11659 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 776 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 58014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 189.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 1902.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 13.408 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 116.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 875.838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1065 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Etwa 9% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1530 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Etwa 7% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1785 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Etwa 67% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 120 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 4.6x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 8004 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8004 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 11659 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 776 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 58014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 189.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1902.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 13.408 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 116.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 875.838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1065 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Turing |
Codename | GA104 | TU116 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 14 March 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $219 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 258 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 120 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 6,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 1 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 229 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8004 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 |