NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 15361
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 643
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 181.818
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 15361 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 643 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 181.818 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 206.4 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3584
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 92696 vs 88251
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 449.647 vs 299.369
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4619.617 vs 4021.382
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.308 vs 28.778
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1410.887 vs 1152.664
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 24877 vs 22495
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 11471 vs 3717
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13334 vs 3356
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 24877 vs 22495
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 11471 vs 3717
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13334 vs 3356
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2380 vs 1961
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 206.4 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 3584 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92696 vs 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 vs 299.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 vs 4021.382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 vs 28.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 vs 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 vs 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 vs 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2380 vs 1961 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 15361 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 643 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 92696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 449.647 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 4619.617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 36.308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 181.818 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 1410.887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 24877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 11471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 13334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 24877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 11471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 13334 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 2380 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA106 | GA104 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Place in performance rating | 134 | 81 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3584 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | 103.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | 206.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |